Wednesday, March 26, 2014

Final conference of the AQUA Project

Personnel from the InfoNitrates Life+ project were invited to attend the final conference of the Aqua Life + Project at C.R.P.A. Technopolo in Reggio Emilia between the 14th and 15th of March 2014. The conference focused on achieving good water quality status in Intensive animal production areas.
Several entities attended the Aqua final conference on March 14th including representatives from the European Commission as well as partners involved in research carried out as part of the Aqua Life+ Project and other Life+ projects. Ms. Alia Atitar De La Fuente, Director General for the environment from the European commission, indicated the problems associated with nitrate contamination as part of the practices used in agriculture and livestock breeding.

Data from EUROSTAT indicates that livestock production has overall remained constant from 2005 until 2007. This created pressure on the industry to meet the ever increasing demands. Nevertheless, water pollution and nitrogen surplus have showed overall reduction which have reflected in a slight improvement in the quality of ground and surface water in terms of nitrate concentration. Conversely, Malta is still showing poor performance with respect to the percentage of nitrates in ground water exceeding the accepted level of 50 mgl-1 as stipulated in the EU Nitrates Directive. Ms. De La Fuente, also pointed out the environment repercussions with respect to nitrate pollution including eutrophication of water bodies. It was stated that it is difficult to determine the trophic state of surface water given that there are many variables which need to be considered. Additionally, there should be guidelines with respect to methodology used for assessing the latter as well in developing a standard method for monitoring to allow comparison.

Participants in the conference outlined results which allow nitrogen control in livestock and agricultural practices. The Aqua project has carried out research on various farms in order to reduce the nitrogen output. The nitrogen recovery efficiency in edible weight of livestock was analysed and it was concluded that poultry farms are the most efficient while cattle are the least. Through the Aqua Project, feed type and ratios were amended so that the nitrogen excreted was less without compromising the assimilated protein in livestock. Moreover, techniques used for manure dispersion have been improved so that levels of nitrogen applied is further controlled and minimized.

Another research within the Aqua project also determined that a buffer zone of at least 1-5m can be designated around the farmland which reduces Nitrates by 70% and the Gross Nitrogen Balance by 60% in the first 5m of the soil. This is however dependent on soil type and associated abiotic factors (e.g. water retention and flow) and biotic conditions.

Further research on nitrogen in heavy pig nutritioncarried out by the Italian Agriculture Research Council indicated that amendment in feeding as well as the type of proteins and amino acids administered to animals is required in order to optimize nitrogen efficiency in farm animals. Amended feeds have shown a reduction in ammonia and nitrate in liquid waste. Also animals which have been underfed for a very short period of time (around five days) will be more efficient in assimilating protein when they are subsequently fed with balanced diet.

Nitrogen management in dairy farms in Netherlands is proving to be challenging given that it is targeted to increase milk production by 15% in 2015. It is questioned whether this is achievable with regards to environmental sustainably particularly in terms of good water quality. Dutch agricultural and livestock sector will strive to recycle nutrients within the same farm, improving feed efficiency as well as decreasing the input of nutrients when compared to the 1980’s. This is to be achieved through control on grazing activity (rotational grazing and restricted grazing time), slurry separation and anaerobic digestion of manure and also implement adequate crop rotation to maintain soil quality (three years grass/clover, two years maize, one year cereal). The livestock farmer will indirectly sanction his activity through the final milk quality produced and the results from compulsory environmental testing (e.g. soil quality). If the latter two results are unsatisfactory, the farmer will not be allowed to intensify his activity and all dairy processing plants will reject the milk produced.

Partners from the Life+ Project in Greece are also utilizing a system where fertilizer dispersion onto the field is determined on site base on chlorophyll concentration in leaves. This allows for better control of fertilizer application and hence control of nitrate in surface and ground water. Furthermore, it was also insisted that the use of synthetic fertilizer is reduced. This can be achieved by utilizing by-products from olive oil processing, which is otherwise not used, as organic fertilizer. Vermicomposting may also be a plausible alternative to synthetic fertilizers in small areas.

All the above activities have also positively impacted air quality where a reduction in methane gas has been observed due to a reduction in the number of animals as well through recovery of Biogas from animal manures. Nonetheless, there is still a lot to be done to decrease emissions from the livestock and agricultural sectors.

On Saturday 15th March, a plant where parmeggiano reggiano cheese was visited. Also, farms where research was carried out as part of the Life+ Aqua Project were visited. One of the farms has emended the feed given to livestock so that to increase nitrogen efficiency. Furthermore, visitors were also shown waste separation of solid and liquid manure as well as storage facilities on the farm. The second visit was made in another farm whose owners have invested in a biodigestor and photovoltaic system to improve their farm efficiency with respect to consumable energy as well as nutrient treatment.

Download the Press Release

Download the Layman's Report

Download the Il progetto LIFE+ AQUA Giuseppe VENERI, Presidente CRPA spa

Download the Nitrates pollution in the EU: policy approaches, lessons learnt and challenges -   Alia Atitar DE LA FUENTE, DG Environment Unit Agriculture, Forests & Soil Nitrates Sector 

Download the Le attività e i risultati del progetto dimostrativo LIFE+ AQUA - Marco LIGABUE, CRPA spa, Paolo MANTOVI, Fondazione CRPA Studi Ricerche

Monday, March 10, 2014

Soil Collection and Analysis


The following photos below show the laboratory procedures carried out to obtaining the NPK values, ultimately leading for the fertilizer plan. 


Soil sampling Collection 

Soil Sampling Collection

The soil is crushed and refined

The soil is sieved and refined

The refined soil sample is then sorted in a labelled sample bottle

Each sample is then mixed witha a reactant. This is carried out according to each specific test

The sample is then placed in a shaker, where it is continually mixed for approximately 45 minutes

The sample is then allowed to be filtered out

The filtrate (filtered soil sample) is then mixed with its prospective reactant (this is carried out according to the specific test)

Once the sample batch is reacted, the solution is then allowed to stand for approximately 15 to 30 minutes where it is then taken in for testing

Samples tested for Potassium (K) are tested via the Photo-Electric Flame Photometer

Samples tested for Nitrates (N) are tested via a Nitrates Probe

Samples tested for Phosphates (P) are tested via a UV-Spectrophotometer